This study reports on a survey that sought the opinions of developers in Ottawa and Tor onto on property taxes and development charges and the effect of these instruments on land-use, density, and the timing of development. The results show that developers do not consider property tax differences in their planning decisions. Spatial differences in development charges are recognized and the instrument can be used as a planning instrument to help redirect growth in ways that help rationalize infrastructure development. Developers did not see development charge differences as reflecting cost differences, nor did they see the charges as easing the development approvals process. The high degree of uncertainty regarding future markets eliminates, in the developers’ view, the effect of the fiscal instruments on the timing of their decisions. Developers build when a reasonable return is possible and do not wait for development opportunities to ripen in ways that would yield even greater profits. The effects of the fiscal instruments are therefore due primarily to their substitution effects. The study supports the use of development charge schedules that accurately reflect the differences in the social cost of building types, density, and location.
1010 Affordable Housing Amazon Amenitization Architecture Artificial Intelligence Asia Australia automation Autonomous Vehicles bonds Borrowing Constraints Brexit California Canada Capital Business China Co-Working Environment coastal markets cold storage Colombia Commercial Brokerage Commercial Real Estate commissions Congestion consumer bias covid-19 CRE credit card market Credit Default Swaps Credit Insurance Credit Risk Transfers Culture Data Analytics data centers Data Collection Technology Debt Market Demand Demographics Density Development Discrete Choice disruption Diversity drones e-Commerce Economic Corridors economic policy economics education election studies Equity Funds Equity Market Ethnic Factors Europe Fannie Mae financial asset management Foreclosures Foreign Policy France Freddie Mac general equilibrium Global global economy Global Financial Crisis Globalization great depression Great Recession healthy buildings Hedonic hospitality Housing & Residential housing boom Housing Disease housing prices Housing Supply Identity Income Inequality India inflation Inter-generational mobility interest rates Investing jobs labor market Lagging Regions land use regulation Language life sciences Macroeconomics malls Market Pricing megacities Microeconomics Migration Minimum Payments Mixed-Use Mobility moral hazard mortgage insurance mortgage market Mortgage Rates Mortgages Multi-family Nation Building Non-Traditional Mortgages Office Market office sector pension funds Placed Based Policies Political Risk Price Discovery Private Equity Business public health public policy Public Schools real estate brokerage Real Estate Investment Real Estate Investment Trusts Recession Rental Retail Retirement reverse mortgages Risk Adjustment risk management risk-shifting robotics single family housing Slums Sorting South America Spatial Regions spillover effect stimulus package Sub-Prime Mortgages Sustainability Technology telecommunications trade transportation unemployment United States Urban Urbanization Warehouse welfare work from home