Mastering the metropolis through research and thought leadership.
Working Papers

Corporate Real Estate Strategies

Working paper #312
Peter Linneman

• For firms in rapidly changing industries, long-term leases are excessively long-lived capital commitments that create a potentially serious duration mismatch between the life cycles of the companies’ operations and its capital needs. For most firms, 3-7 year leases offer the best match to their changing needs.
• Corporate real estate managers’ attempts to reduce the impact of rising rents by buying or long-term leasing space are the equivalent of “chasing rainbows”. On average, present day real estate prices capitalize expected future rents, so that buying property merely locks in higher expected future rents, a fact often obscured by the “magic” of straight-line depreciation.
• When determining the length of leases, corporate users should err on the side of too short, rather than too long. The cost of leasing too short is relatively calculable and manageable—a few dollars per foot more if they had signed a longer lease. The cost of leasing too long is more difficult to determine precisely and to manage. It includes the foregone return from deploying capital in a more attractive business opportunity as well as the loss in flexibility associated with illiquid and immobile assets.
• Most corporate users should liquefy their current ownership positions. Options available include obtaining matching non-recourse debt, which reduces the amount of capital tied up in corporate real estate. Alternative strategies include selling properties one-off or as a portfolio, swapping properties for shares of public companies, or a tax free spin-off to share holders.

Download full paper · 1MB PDF


In This Section
Explore Topics

1010 Affordable Housing Amazon Amenitization Architecture Artificial Intelligence Asia Australia automation Autonomous Vehicles bonds Borrowing Constraints Brexit California Canada Capital Business China Co-Working Environment coastal markets cold storage Colombia Commercial Brokerage Commercial Real Estate commissions Congestion consumer bias covid-19 CRE credit card market Credit Default Swaps Credit Insurance Credit Risk Transfers Culture Data Analytics data centers Data Collection Technology Debt Market Demand Demographics Density Development Discrete Choice disruption Diversity drones e-Commerce Economic Corridors economic policy economics education election studies Equity Funds Equity Market Ethnic Factors Europe Fannie Mae financial asset management Foreclosures Foreign Policy France Freddie Mac general equilibrium Global global economy Global Financial Crisis Globalization great depression Great Recession healthy buildings Hedonic hospitality Housing & Residential housing boom Housing Disease housing prices Housing Supply Identity Income Inequality India inflation Inter-generational mobility interest rates Investing jobs labor market Lagging Regions land use regulation Language life sciences Macroeconomics malls Market Pricing megacities Microeconomics Migration Minimum Payments Mixed-Use Mobility moral hazard mortgage insurance mortgage market Mortgage Rates Mortgages Multi-family Nation Building Non-Traditional Mortgages Office Market office sector pension funds Placed Based Policies Political Risk Price Discovery Private Equity Business public health public policy Public Schools real estate brokerage Real Estate Investment Real Estate Investment Trusts Recession Rental Retail Retirement reverse mortgages Risk Adjustment risk management risk-shifting robotics single family housing Slums Sorting South America Spatial Regions spillover effect stimulus package Sub-Prime Mortgages Supply Chains Sustainability Technology telecommunications trade transportation unemployment United States Urban Urbanization Warehouse welfare work from home

arrow_drop_up